It’s no secret that social media has devolved into a toxic cesspool of disinformation and hate speech.

Without any meaningful pressure to come up with effective guardrails and enforceable policies, social media platforms quickly turned into rage-filled and polarizing echo chambers with one purpose: to keep users hooked on outrage and brain rot so they can display more ads.

And given the results of a recent experiment by researchers at the University of Amsterdam, they may be doomed to stay that way.

As detailed in a yet-to-be-peer-reviewed study, coauthors Petter Törnberg, AI and social media assistant professor, and research assistant Maik Larooij simulated a social media platform that was populated entirely by AI chatbots, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4o large language model, to see if there was anything we could do to stop social media from turning into echo chambers.

They tested out six specific intervention strategies — including switching to chronological news feeds, boosting diverse viewpoints, hiding social statistics like follower counts, and removing account bios — to stop the platform from turning into a polarized hellscape.

To their dismay, none of the interventions worked to a satisfactory degree, and only some showed modest effects. Worse yet, as Ars Technica reports, some of them made the situation even worse.

For instance, ordering the news feed chronologically reduced attention inequality but floated extreme content to the top.

It’s a sobering reality that flies in the face of companies’ promises of constructing a “digital town square” — as billionaire and X owner Elon Musk once called it — where everybody coexists peacefully.

With or without intervention, social media platforms may be doomed to devolve into a highly polarized breeding ground for extremist thinking.

“Can we identify how to improve social media and create online spaces that are actually living up to those early promises of providing a public sphere where we can deliberate and debate politics in a constructive way?” Törnberg asked Ars.

The AI and social media assistant professor admitted that using AI isn’t a “perfect solution” due to “all kind of biases and limitations.” However, the tech can capture “human behavior in a more plausible way.”

Törnberg explained that it’s not just triggering pieces of content that result in highly polarized online communities.

Toxic content “also shapes the network structures that are formed,” he told Ars, which in turn “feeds back what content you see, resulting in a toxic network.”

As a result, there’s an “extreme inequality of attention,” where a tiny minority of posts get the most visibility.

And in the age of generative AI, these effects could become even more pronounced.

“We already see a lot of actors — based on this monetization of platforms like X — that are using AI to produce content that just seeks to maximize attention,” Törnberg told Ars. “So misinformation, often highly polarized information — as AI models become more powerful, that content is going to take over.”

“I have a hard time seeing the conventional social media models surviving that,” he added.

More on social media: Facebook Planning to Flood Platform with AI-Powered Users

The post Scientists Created an Entire Social Network Where Every User Is a Bot, and Something Wild Happened appeared first on Futurism.

Origianl Creator:Victor Tangermann
Original Link: https://futurism.com/social-network-ai-intervention-echo-chamber
Originally Posted: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:36:33 +0000