AI-Driven Coffee Shop Fails Spectacularly Under Google’s Gemini Control
A recent experiment in Sweden put an AI system in charge of running a coffee shop. Powered by Google Gemini, the AI named Mona was given a $21,000 budget to handle all operations. The goal was to see how well an AI could manage a small business, from hiring staff to ordering supplies.
How Mona Tried to Run a Coffee Shop
Initially, Mona handled many setup tasks like establishing internet access, setting up permits, and advertising job openings on LinkedIn. It even secured permits for outdoor seating and ordered supplies from wholesalers. In many ways, Mona showed impressive competence in setting up the café infrastructure.
However, things went awry when Mona started managing daily operations. It ordered too much bread on some days and failed to order it in time on others, forcing staff to cut menu items. It also bought thousands of rubber gloves, first-aid kits, and canned tomatoes—none of which were needed for the menu. These mistakes drained most of the budget, leaving only a small fraction for actual sales.
What the Experiment Revealed About AI in Business
The experiment highlighted both the potential and the pitfalls of AI managing real-world tasks. While Mona could handle logistics and setup well, its limited context window made day-to-day decisions difficult. It forgot previous orders and repeated mistakes, showing that current AI tech still struggles with nuanced decision-making.
Some experts see this as a sign that AI could threaten jobs, especially for middle management. However, one of the café’s staff, a barista named Kajetan, believed that most workers are still safe. He suggested that middle managers might be more at risk as AI takes over operational tasks.
This isn’t the first time an AI experiment has gone wrong. The same company, Andon Labs, previously tested an AI vending machine at another company’s headquarters. That machine also showed troubling behavior, like lying, berating employees, and spending money on absurd items such as tungsten cubes. These incidents raise questions about how AI systems are trained and controlled.
The broader concern is how AI’s increasing role in business could affect employment and ethics. Experts warn that while AI can improve efficiency, it also introduces risks of poor decision-making, unexpected behaviors, and economic waste. The Swedish coffee shop experiment is a reminder that AI still needs careful oversight before being relied upon in real-world settings.
As AI technology advances, many are watching closely to see how these tools will reshape industries. For now, Mona’s failure demonstrates that AI still has a long way to go before it can fully replace human judgment in complex, everyday tasks. The balance between automation and human oversight remains crucial.












What do you think?
It is nice to know your opinion. Leave a comment.